Preview only show first 10 pages with watermark. For full document please download

Civil Project. Ppt Recycled Aggregate Concrete

RECYCLED AGGREGATE CONCRETE IN RIGID PAVEMENT FINAL YEAR PROJECT

   EMBED


Share

Transcript

RECYCLEDAGGREGATECONCRETE I N RI GI DP AVEME MENT NTS PROJECT BY : HITESH BHOI KAILASH KUMAR GUPTA MD JUNAID NOSHIN PRAVEEN GUIDE: SHARMA H.D. ASHWINI CONTENT • • • • • • • • • • INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND OBJECTIVES ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES LITERATURE REVIEW METHODOLOGY DESIGN AND ANALYSIS  TESTING CONCLUSION I NTRODUCTI ON • • • •  To achiee !"!#ai$a%&e i!!"e i$ co$!#'"c#io$ a'ea( 'e!ea'che'! a$) co*+a$ie! ,oc"! o$ "!i$- .a!#e co$c'e#e a! a $e. co$!#'"c#io$ *a#e'ia&/ I# i! ca&&e) recycled aggregate .hich ca$ %e +'o)"ce) %0 co$c'e#e c'"!he'/  The a--'e-a#e! a'e ca#e-o'i1e) %0 !i1e a! coa'!e a$) 2$e a--'e-a#e/  The cha'ac#e'i!#ic o, 'ec0c&e) a--'e-a#e! co"&) %e )i3e'e$# %0 i#! +a'e$# co$c'e#e %eca"!e #he +a'e$# co$c'e#e .a! )e!i-$e) ,o' i#! +"'+o!e! !"ch a! +e'*ea%i&i#0( )"'a%i&i#0 a$) hi-h !#'e$-#h co$c'e#e/ HISTORICAL BACKGROUND • • • •  The a++&ica#io$! o, 'ec0c&e) a--'e-a#e i$ #he co$!#'"c#io$ a'ea! a'e .i)e a$) #he0 ha) %ee$ "!e) &o$- #i*e a-o/ Wilmot and Vorobief 456678 !#a#e) #ha# 'ec0c&e) a--'e-a#e hae %ee$ "!e) i$ #he 'oa) i$)"!#'0 ,o' #he &a!# 599 0ea'! i$ A"!#'a&ia/ The0 a&!o !#a#e) #ha# #he "!e o, 'ec0c&e) a--'e-a#e ,o' #he co$!#'"c#io$ a$) 'eha%i&i#a#io$ o, &oca& -oe'$*e$# 'oa)! ha! a -'ea# i*+'oe i$ #he &a!# 2e 0ea'! C & D Recycling Industry 4$/)/8( #he ,ac# 2&e !#a#e) #ha# ,'o* #he #i*e o, #he Ro*a$!( #he !#o$e! ,'o* #he +'eio"! 'oa)! .e'e 'e"!e) .he$ 'e%"i&)i$- #hei' a"$#e) !e# o, 'oa)!/ I# a&!o !#a#e) #ha# !i$ce #he e$) o, Wo'&) Wa' II( #he 'ec0c&i$- i$)"!#'0 ha) %ee$ .e&& e!#a%&i!he) i$ E"'o+e/  Acco')i$- #o Seecharan 499;8( #he De#'oi) Ne.! !#a#e) #ha# i$ 56<9!( #he o&) co$c'e#e c'"!he) i$#o a +o.)e' .a! a +o+"&a' 'oa) %"i&)e' a# Michi-a$( USA OBJ ECTI VES • • • •  To 2$) o"# #he = "!e ,ea!i%&e ,o' co$!#'"c#io$  To 'e)"ce #he i*+ac# o, .a!#e *a#e'ia&! o$ e$i'o$*e$#  To ca''0 o"# )i3e'e$# #e!#! o$ 'ec0c&e) a--'e-a#e! > $a#"'a& a--'e-a#e! a$) co*+a'e #hei' 'e!"&#!  To 2$) o"# #he .a0! o, co!# !ai$- !"ch a! #'a$!+o'#a#io$ co!#!( e?caa#io$ co!#!( e#c/ ADVANTAGES • Co!# !ai$ The'e a'e $o )e#'i*e$#a& e3ec#! o$ co$c'e#e > i# i! e?+ec#e) #ha# #he i$c'ea!e i$ #he co!# o, ce*e$# co"&) %e o3!e# %0 #he &o.e' co!# o, Rec0c&e) Co$c'e#e A--'e-a#e 4RCA8/ •    • Sae e$i'o$*e$#  The'e i! $o e?caa#io$ o, $a#"'a& 'e!o"'ce! > &e!! #'a$!+o'#a#io$/ Le!! &a$) i! 'e@"i'e)/ Le!! e*i!!io$ o, ca'%o$ )"e #o &e!! c'"!hi$-/ Sae #i*e  The'e i! $o .ai#i$- ,o' *a#e'ia& aai&a%i&i#0/ •  Jo% o++o'#"$i#0 C'ea#e! e*+&o0*e$# o++o'#"$i#ie! a$) eco$o*ic ac#ii#ie! i$ 'ec0c&i$- i$)"!#'ie! DI S ADVANTAGES • • • • • Le!! @"a&i#0 4e/-/ co*+'e!!ie !#'e$-#h 'e)"ce! %0 599=8/ D"'a#io$ o, +'oc"'e*e$# o, *a#e'ia&! *a0 a3ec# &i,e c0c&e o, +'oec#/ La$)( !+ecia& e@"i+*e$#! > *achi$e'ie! a'e 'e@"i'e) 4*o'e co!#8/ Ve'0 hi-h .a#e' a%!o'+#io$ 4"+ #o =8/ I# ha! hi-he' )'0i$- !h'i$a-e > c'ee+/ LI TERATUREREVI EW • •  The a++&ica#io$! o, 'ec0c&e) a--'e-a#e i$ #he co$!#'"c#io$ a'ea a'e e'0 .i)e/ The'e a'e *a$0 #e!#i$- %a!e) o$ #he 'ec0c&e) a--'e-a#e hae %ee$ ca''ie) o"# a&& a'o"$) #he .o'&)/ Ha$!o$ a$) To'%e$ 456<8 !#a#e) #ha# !i$ce 56;F( #he 'e!ea'ch o$ 'ec0c&e) a--'e-a#e ha) %ee$ ca''ie) o"# i$ *a$0 co"$#'ie!/ So*e o, #he &i#e'a#"'e 'eie.! o$ 'ec0c&e) a--'e-a#e a'e !ho.$ a! %e&o./ J 1. Re c y c l e dConc r e t eAggr e gat e ,aSus t ai nabl e Opt i onf r om De mol i t i onConc r e t eWas t e -A Pe r c e nt ageRe pl ac e me ntMe t hod AUTHORS: Pr a vee nMat he w  J e e vanJ ac ob Le niS t e phe n ThomasPa ul ( 2 0 1 4 )   OBJ ECTI VE: CONCLUSI ON: Tofindoutt heper ce nt r e pl a c e me ntt ha toffe r sabe t t e r s t r uc t ur a lpr ope r t yi nc o mpa r i s o n wi t ht hec onv ent i ona lc onc r e t e . S e l e c t e dRe pl a c e me nt s : 0% ( NAC) , 20 %( RAC20 ) , 30 %( RAC30 )a nd 40 %( RAC40 ) de al 1 .Re c y c l e da ggr e ga t ei sa ni s ubs t i t ut e   f ort hena t ur a l a ggr e ga t ei ns t r uc t ur a lc onc r e t e . 2 .Max i mum  Va l ue so fs t r e ngt h we r eo bt a i ne da t40% r epl ac ement .  J 2. Pe r f or manc eofRi gi d Pa ve me nt sc ont ai ni ngRCA AUTHORS: GREGORY D/ CUTTEL MARK B/ SNYDER  JULIE M/ VANDENBOSSCHE MONTY J/ WADE OBJ ECTI VE: 1 .T oi de nt i f yt hema t e r i a la nd pa v e me ntde s i gn f a c t or st ha t ha v er e s ul t e di nbo t hGo od andUnac c ept abl e per f or manc e. 2 .Fi e l ds t udyf oc us e dont he c a us e sofpa v e me ntdi s t r e s s e s a s s oc i a t e dwi t ht heus eo f RCAi nPCCs ur f ac el aye r s . CONCLUSI ON: 1. Compar abl ePa vement per f or manc ee  b t we e nr e c yc l e d andc onvent i onalPCCpa vement s wase s pec i al l ycommonwhen t he r ewe r es i mi l aramount sof na t ur a la ggr e g a t e si nt hePCC mi x t ur e s . 2 .Re c ur r e ntDc r a c ki ngwasnot obs er vedonanyoft hes ur ver yed pr oj e ct s . 3. Rec ur r entASRa ppear edt o pr e s e nti ns ma l ll oc a l i z eda r e a si n oneoft hepr oj e c ta ss o ona s9 ye ar saf t e rc o ns t r uc t i on.  J 3. RECYCLED CONCRETEAGGREGATEI N CONCRETEPAVEMENTS: AFI VEYEARSTUDY ON I TSEFFECTON PAVEMENTPERFORMANCE AUTHORS: Fe de r i c oI r a l i  Al e k sKi vi  J a me sT.Smi t h S us a nL. Ti g he Ce s a r eSa ng i o r g i ( 2 0 1 3 ) OBJ ECTI VE: CONCLUSI ON: i me nt a lc o nc r e t e Theobj e c t i veoft hi sr e s e ar c h 1.Fourexper pa v e me nts e c t i ons , e a c h pr oj e c twa st oe va l ua t et he c o nt a i ni ngadi ffe r e ntpe r c e nt a ge l o ng t e r m pe r f o r ma nc eof ofRCAi nt hec oncr et emi x,wer e c o nc r e t epa v e me nt swi t h  bui l tatt heCP ATTt e s tt r ac ki n di ffe r e ntpe r c e nt a g e so fRCA 2007andal lr emai ni nver ygood t hr ought hec o ns t r uc t i onof c ondi t i ona f t e rb ei ngs ubj e c t e dt o f ul ls c al et e s ts e c t i onst hatwas t r afficl oadi ngf ormoret hanfive y e a r s . i ns t r ume nt e dwi t hv ar i o us s e ns or st oana l yz ea nd 2 .I ts ugge s tt ha tt hei nc r e as e dus e ec o nc r e t ei nt hef or m of moni t orpave mentr es pons es ofwast RCAi sf e a s i bl ei nc o nc r e t e o v e rt i me . pa v e me nt s , i fpe r f o r ma nc e c o mpa r a bl et ovi r gi nma t e r i a l sc a n  bee xpe c t e d  J 3. RECYCLED CONCRETEAGGREGATEI N CONCRETEPAVEMENTS: AFI VEYEARSTUDY ON I TSEFFECTON PAVEMENTPERFORMANCE AUTHORS: Fe de r i c oI r a l i  Al e k sKi vi  J a me sT.Smi t h S us a nL. Ti g he Ce s a r eSa ng i o r g i ( 2 0 1 3 ) OBJ ECTI VE: CONCLUSI ON: i me nt a lc o nc r e t e Theobj e c t i veoft hi sr e s e ar c h 1.Fourexper pa v e me nts e c t i ons , e a c h pr oj e c twa st oe va l ua t et he c o nt a i ni ngadi ffe r e ntpe r c e nt a ge l o ng t e r m pe r f o r ma nc eof ofRCAi nt hec oncr et emi x,wer e c o nc r e t epa v e me nt swi t h  bui l tatt heCP ATTt e s tt r ac ki n di ffe r e ntpe r c e nt a g e so fRCA 2007andal lr emai ni nver ygood t hr ought hec o ns t r uc t i onof c ondi t i ona f t e rb ei ngs ubj e c t e dt o f ul ls c al et e s ts e c t i onst hatwas t r afficl oadi ngf ormoret hanfive y e a r s . i ns t r ume nt e dwi t hv ar i o us s e ns or st oana l yz ea nd 2 .I ts ugge s tt ha tt hei nc r e as e dus e ec o nc r e t ei nt hef or m of moni t orpave mentr es pons es ofwast RCAi sf e a s i bl ei nc o nc r e t e o v e rt i me . pa v e me nt s , i fpe r f o r ma nc e c o mpa r a bl et ovi r gi nma t e r i a l sc a n  bee xpe c t e d  J 4 . USEOFRECYCLED AGGREGATECONCRETE AUTHORS: M'/ T"!ha' R So$a.a$e D'/ S"$i& S/ Pi*+&ia' OBJ ECTI VE: 1. Tofindoutt he% us e f e as i bl ef orc ons t r uc t i on. 2 .T or e duc et hei mpa c tof wa s t ema t e r i a l son e n vi r o nme nt . 3 .Toc a r r youtdi ffe r e ntt e s t s onr e c y c l e da ggr e g at e s& na t ur a la ggr e g a t e s&c o mpa r e t he i rr e s ul t s . 4 .T ofindo utt hewa y so fc o s t s a vi ngs uc ha st r a ns por t a t i on, e xc a vat i one t c . CONCLUSI ON: 1 . Us eo fr e c y c l e da ggr e g at eupt o 3 0 % do e sno ta ffe c tt hef unc t i o na l r e qui r e me nt so ft hes t r uc t ur ea s pe rt hefindi ngsoft het e s tr e s ul t s . 2 .Va r i o ust e s t sc onduc t e don r e c y c l e da ggr e ga t e sa ndr e s ul t s compar edwi t hnat ur alaggr egat es a r es at i s f a c t or ya spe rI S2 38 6. 3 .Duet ous eo fr e c y c l e da ggr e ga t e i nc o ns t r uc t i on, e ne r gy&c o s tof t r a ns por t a t i onofna t ur a lr e s our c e s &e x c a va t i oni ss i gni fic a nt l ys a v e d. METHODOLOGY       N       O    I      T      C     E      L      L       O      C Col l ec t i onofPl ai nCementConcr et e( PCC)f r om s i t e( KumarSwamyLayout )       G       N    I       H     S       U      R      C Col l e c t e dma t e r i a li sc r us he db yha mme rt os e pa r a t et hea ggr e ga t e sa ndr e duc et he i rs i z e si n s mal l e rf r a c t i on. TESTI NG Conduc t i ngva r i oust e s t sa r ec o nduc t e di nl a bor a t or yaspe rI Sc ode&t he i rr e s ul t sa r e c o mpa r e dwi t hna t ur a la ggr e g a t e Conc r e t e I ti sc r us he d,t he r e i nf or c e me ntba ri s r emoved,andt he ma t e r i a li ss c r e e ne d f ors i ze .Mar ke t out l e t sf orr e c yc l e d c onc r e t ei nc l ude r oa dba s e ,ge ne r a l fil l ,pa v e me nt a ggr e g at e ,a nd dr ai nagemedi a. DESI GN &ANALYSI S MIX PROPORIO!I!" • The *i? +'o+o'#io$i$- .a! )o$e a! +e' #he Indian standards #IS $%'(%%)*/ The ce*e$# "!e) i! o, !i$-&e o'i-i$ Portland Po++olana #0+e .i#h specifc gravity 2.6/ ,""R-",-: Rec0c&e) a--'e-a#e! co*+'i!e! o, crushed, graded inorganic particles +'oce!!e) ,'o* co$!#'"c#io$ a$) )e*o&i#io$ co$c'e#e )e%'i!/ The!e *a#e'ia&! .e'e o%#ai$e) ,'o* a +ae*e$#/ TESTI NG S.,P- -S : a! +e' IS:<4+a'# I856  E&o$-a#io$ I$)e? #e!#  &ai$e!! I$)e? #e!#  Co*%i$e) I$)e? #e!#  A$-"&a'i#0 $"*%e' #e!# ,""R-",- CR/S.I!" V,0/- a! +e' IS <4+a'# IV8 56 ,""R-",- IMP,C V,0/- a! +e' IS <4+a'# IV856 0OS ,!"-0-S ,1R,SIO! a! +e' IS <4+a'# IV856 W,-R ,1SORPIO! -S a! +e' IS <4+a'# IV856 COMPR-SSIV- SR-!". -S a! +e' IS Co)e SP0I -!SI0- -S a! +e' IS Co)e 20-X/R,0 SR-!". -S a! +e' IS Co)e • • • • • • • • CONCLUSI ON & EXPECTEDRESULTS • • • • Va'io"! tests conducted on recycled aggregates a$) results co*+a'e) .i#h $a#"'a& a--'e-a#e! a'e satis3actory a! +e' IS 45' D"e #o use o3 recycled aggregate i$ co$!#'"c#io$( energy & cost o, #'a$!+o'#a#io$ o, $a#"'a& 'e!o"'ce! > e?caa#io$ i! signi6cantly sa7ed8 He$ce )i'ec#&0 reduces the im9act o3 :aste *a#e'ia& o$ e$i'o$*e$#/ ER: Achiei$- #he *a?i*"* !#'e$-#h a# ;9= 'e+&ace*e$#/ THECHOI CEI SYOURS  TO LANDILL  TO RECYCLE THANKYOU