Preview only show first 10 pages with watermark. For full document please download

Wdm Overlay Of Apon With Epon

   EMBED


Share

Transcript

AT&T Labs-Research WDM Overlay of APON with EPON - a carrier’s perspective Nicholas J. Frigo & Cedric F. Lam Optical Systems Research Dept., AT&T Labs - Research 200 S. Laurel Ave., Middletown, NJ 07748, USA Wavelength Allocation in ITU-T Rec. G.983.3 AT&T Labs-Research customer premise central office WDM APON OLT APON ONU EONU 1:32 WDM EOLT Enhanced band (option 2): For video distribution Enhanced band (option 1): For future additional digital APON use service downstream APON upstream For future use L-band 1260 1360 1480 1500 1539 1550 1560 1565 EOLT: enhanced OLT EONU: enhanced ONU wavelength (nm) The Value of Fiber Plant AT&T Labs-Research Estimated Cost per Building to Deploy Fiber in a Passive Optical Network $ per building Aerial Exist Conduit Trench New Conduit Outside Plant 4,161 4,161 4,161 4,161 Labor 3,787 4,436 14,199 26,299 ONU 4,435 4,435 4,435 4,435 OLT 1,247 1,247 1,247 1,247 Total Cost $13,630 $14,279 $24,042 $36,142 Source: Merrill Lynch, Corning Cable Systems 1.5µ µm Optical Window “Infinite” Bandwidth ≈ 10,000 GHz 1.3µ µm Optical Window 10,000 GHz 100 GHz 1 GHz Coax Capacity 1 GHz Satellite Capacity Low Cost Coarse WDM Technology AT&T Labs-Research ! DWDM: " " ! Intensity High-cost, high-capacity Core network technology 100GHz DWDM (Dense) CWDM: Low-cost, moderate-capacity " Suitable for metro & access (i.e.: the FIRST MILE) " CWDM (Coarse) 20nm Wavelength CWDM Usage ! 10GBASE-LX4 (IEEE802.3ae): " " ! Low cost CWDM parallel PHY standard for 10Gb/s Ethernet 20nm bands centered at: 1290, 1310, 1330 & 1350nm De facto standard: " 20nm bands centered at 1491, 1511, 1531, 1551nm... Wavelength Accuracy Requirements AT&T Labs-Research ! ITU-T 983.3 standard temp requirements. " " " ! DFB laser accuracy " ! temp coefficient: 0.08nm/oC ⇒ 7.2nm over 90oC for uncooled DFB Athermal thin film CWDM " ! OLT: 5 to 40oC Indoor ONU: -5 to 45oC Outdoor ONU: -45 to 45oC temp coefficient: 2pm/oC ⇒ 1.8nm over 90oC Use 10nm band with 20nm separation " 15 available bands between 1300nm and 1600nm Cost Considerations AT&T Labs-Research ! DWDM. " " " ! ITU grid DFB laser: $1,000 DWDM Mux-Demux: $200 - $500 per wavelength Temperature control required. CWDM " " Uncooled DFB: $50 - $100 CWDM: $50-100 per wavelength Fiber plant costs at least ~$14,000 per user... ! Need a standard for “plug-N-play” CWDM technology Emerging Low Cost WDM Components … AT&T Labs-Research Intensity Band 1.3- 1.3+ 1.4- 1.4+ 1.5- 1.5+ Wavelength (µm) 1.3- 1.4- 1.5- Sorter 1.3+ 1.4+ Intensity Band 1.3 1.3 + 1.5 1.5 - + 1.3 - 1.5 - Sorter Wavelength (µm) • Gratings • Thin films • Planar waveguide circuits 1.3 + 1.5 + 1.3/1.5 WDM “diplexer” 1.5+ … Overlaying APON with EPON AT&T Labs-Research Pave the way for diverse future services. Central Office Band PS EPON OLT Sorter Feeder Fiber Sorter T EPON R ONU 1 ... Backbone Network APON OLT Band T APON R ONU 1 Band Sorter • 2 PONs for 1 infrastructure – Low cost CWDM (band sorter) overlay – $ band sorter << $ ONU << $ fiber • Flexible service provisioning – e.g. video overlay in other bands like in ITU-T Rec. 983.3 T EPON R ONU2 Which One to Choose? AT&T Labs-Research Option 1: band sorter 1.3- 1.3+ 1.4- 1.4+ Option 2: ITU-T Rec. G.983.3 1.5- Enhanced band (option 1): For future additional digital APON use service downstream APON upstream 1.5+ wavelength (nm) Enhanced band (option 2): For video distribution For future use L-band 1260 1360 1480 1500 1539 1550 1560 1565 wavelength (nm) Option 3: de facto CWDM standard 20nm wavelength (nm) Power Budget Consideration AT&T Labs-Research ! ITU-T REC 983.3 " " ! class B: 25dB between OLT and ONU class C: 30dB between OLT and ONU CWDM: Extra wavelength filters add additional loss " 8dB (4dB mux + 4dB demux) CWDM loss (average value for commercial 8 band CWDM devices) " EPON/GbE (1.25Gb/s) requires 3dB more power than 622Mbps APON " Amplification over 200-300nm wide optical band is not easy " ! Solutions: " " " " " Apply higher power LDs (lasers are getting better everyday!) Use APD detectors (10 to 15dB gain) Use FEC (~10dB gain) Reduce splitting ratio Reduce fiber reach