Transcript
CASES FOR DIGESTING IN CIVIL PROCEDURE 1. Atty. Romulo Macalintal vs. Presidential Electoral Tribunal, G.R. No. 191618, June 7, 2011 Reina & roel 2. Jimmy Barnes vs. Judge Padilla, G.R. No. 160753, June 28, 2005 3. Solgen vs. Metro Manila Authority, G.R. No. 102782, December 11, 1991 Alexis & Dynavie 4. Domingo De Guzman vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 103276, April 11, 1996 5. Danilo Parel vs. Heirs of Simeon Prudencio, G.R. No. 192217, March 2, 2011 Aran & Lara 6. Golden Arches Development Corporation vs. St. Francis Square Holdings, Inc., G.R. No. 183843. January 19, 2011 7. Sps. Bergonia vs. CA, G.R. No. 189151, January 25, 2012 Bryan &Divine 8. Reyes vs. Lim, 408 SCRA 560 9. St. Martin Funeral Homes vs. NLRC, 295 SCRA 494 Gretel & Kristel 10. Alcazaren vs. Univet Agri., 476 SCRA 636 11. Lions Club International vs. Amores, 121 SCRA 621 Oscar &Leng 12. Felipe vs. Leuterio, 91 Phil. 482 13. U.S. vs. Cañete, 38 Phil. 253 Janeth& Roger 14. Fortuno vs. Hon. Palma, G.R. No. 70203, December 18, 1987, 156 SCRA 691 15. Yau vs. Manila Banking Corporation, 384 SCRA 340 Sam & Carol 16. Ngo Bun Tiong vs. Judge Sayo, 163 SCRA 237 17. Paper Industries Corporation vs. IAC, 151 SCRA 161 Beth & Aiza 18. NEA vs. Mendoza, 138 SCRA 632 19. PICOP vs. IAC, 151 SCRA 161 Ira &Lyndon 20. Traders Royal Bank vs. IAC, 133 SCRA 259 21. Santos vs. Bayhon, 199 SCRA 525 22. Arevalo vs. Benedicto, 58 SCRA 186 23. Planas vs. CIR, 3 SCRA 395 24. Anuran vs. Aquino, 38 Phil. 29 25. Andaya vs. Abadia, 228 SCRA 705 26. Zamora vs. CA, 183 SCRA 279 27. Solid Homes Inc., vs. Payawal, 177 SCRA 72 28. Estoesta vs. CA, 179 SCRA 203 29. Abain vs. Chua, 11 SCRA 754 30. Dela Cruz vs. CA, 510 SCRA 103 31. ABC Auto Supply vs. CA, 284 SCRA 218 32. Heirs of Dela Cruz vs. Heirs of Dela Cruz, 475 SCRA 743 33. Asia Internationa Auctioneers vs. Parayno, G.R. No. 163445, Dec. 18, 2007 34. ACE vs. Commissioner of Customs, 11 SCRA 147 35. Padunan vs. DARAB, 396 SCRA 196 36. United Homeowners Association, Inc., vs. BF Homes, Inc., 310 SCRA 304 37. Municipality of Antipolo vs. Zapanta, 133 SCRA 820 38. Rep vs. Marcos, 29 SCRA 517 39. Rep vs. Marcos, 52 SCRA 238 40. Mangaspi vs. Ramolete, 115 SCRA 193 41. Manchester vs. CA, 149 SCRA 562 42. Sun Insurance vs. Asuncion, 170 SCRA 274 43. Pilipinas Shell vs. CA, 171 SCRA 674 44. Original Development and Construction Corp vs. CA, 202 SCRA 753 45. Ballatan vs. CA, 304 SCRA 35 46. Hodges vs. CA, 184 SCRA 281 47. Calauag vs. Pecson, 82 Phil. 12 48. Davao and Light Power Co., Inc., vs. CA, 204 SCRA 343 49. Ang Ping vs. CA, 310 SCRA 343 50. Navale vs. CA, 253 SCRA 699 51. La Naval Drug vs. CA, 236 SCRA 78; 2 nd sentence, Sec. 20, Rule 14 and Sec. 8, Rule 15 52. Jose vs. Bayon, 414 SCRA 216 53. Avon Insurance PLC vs. CA, G.R. No. 97642, August 29, 1997 54. French Oil Machinery Co., vs. CA, 295 SCRA 462 55. Asiavest Ltd., vs. CA, 296 SCRA 539 56. Gomez vs. CA, 425 SCRA 98 57. PCIB vs. Alejandro, 533 SCRA 738 58. Biaco vs. PCRB, 515 SCRA 106 59. Alba vs. CA, 465 SCRA 495 60. Navale vs. CA, 253 SCRA 705 61. Carballo vs. Encarnacion, 92 SCRA 974 62. De Jesus vs. Garcia, 19 SCRA 554 63. Sanchez vs. Marin, G.R. No. 171346, October 19, 2007 64. Department of Health vs. NLRC, 251 SCRA 700 65. Zamora vs. CA, 183 SCRA 279 66. Magay vs. Estandian, 69 SCRA 456 67. Sarmiento vs. CA, 262 SCRA 101 68. Tinitigan vs. Tinitigan, 100 SCRA 619 69. Notre Dame de Lourdes Hosp vs. Judge Mallare-Philipps, 197 SCRA 87 70. Bernardo vs. CA, 263 SCRA 660 71. Sea-Land Service Inc., vs. Cabato, 327 SCRA 521 72. Commart (Phils.), Inc., vs. SEC, 198 SCRA 73 73. Multinational Village Homeowners vs. CA, 203 SCRA 104 74. De Jesus vs. Bristol Laboratories 55 SCRA 349 75. Dela Rama vs. Mendiola, 401 SCRA 704 76. La Naval Drug vs. CA, 236 SCRA 78 77.Philex Mining Corp vs. Reyes, 118 SCRA 602 78.Union Glass and Container Corp., vs. SEC, 126 SCRA 31 79.BSBA vs. Leano, 127 SCRA 778 80.Realty Exchange vs. Sendino, 233 SCRA 665 81.Solid Homes vs. Payawal, 177 SCRA 72 82. Arranza vs. B.F. Homes, Inc., 333 SCRA 799 83. Rep vs. Asset Privatization Trust, 475 SCRA 608 84. Tolentino vs. Leviste, 443 SCRA 274 85. Cabrera vs. Lapid, 510 SCRA 55 86. Heirs of Maura So vs. Obliosca, 542 SCRA 406 87.Banco Filipino Savings and Mortgage Bank vs. CA, 334 SCRA 305 88. Suntay vs. Gacolay, 470 SCRA 627 89. BPI vs. ALS Management & Development Corp., 427 SCRA 564 90. Makawiag vs. Balindong, 502 SCRA 454 4. How jurisdiction is conferred and determined 91. Padre vs. Badillo, et., al., G.R. No. 165423, January 19, 2011 92. De Jesus vs. Garcia, 19 SCRA 554 93. De Leon vs. CA, 245 SCRA 166 94. RP vs. Estipular, 336 SCRA 333 95. Sanchez vs. Marin, supra 96. Zamora vs. CA, supra 97. De Jesus vs. Garcia, supra 98 Santos vs. Northwest Orient Airlines, 210 SCRA 256 99. Del Castillo vs. Aguinaldo, 212 SCRA 169 100.Amigo vs. CA, 253 SCRA 382 101.Sea Land Service, Inc., vs. CA, 327 SCRA 135 102Navales vs. Abaya, 441 SCRA 393 103Dela Cruz vs. CA, 510 SCRA 103 104Guiang vs. CA, 510 SCRA 568 105Dela Rosa vs. Roldan, 501 SCRA 34 106. Bokingo vs. CA, 489 SCRA 521 107. Tecson vs. Guiterrez, 452 SCRA 781 108. Gocotano vs. Gocotano, 469 SCRA 326 108.Denilla vs. Bellosillo, 64 SCRA 63 109Tinitigan vs. Tinitigan, supra 110. Lahom vs. Sibulo, 406 SCRA 135 111. Commart vs. SEC, supra 112. Multinational Village vs. CA, supra 113. Baltazar vs. Ombudsman, 510 SCRA 74 114. Solid Homes vs. CA, 271 SCRA 157 115. Bulao vs. CA, 218 SCRA 321Inton vs. Quintana, 81 Phil. 120 116. Concepcion vs. CFI of Bulacan, 119 SCRA 222 117. Bayog vs. Natino, 258 SCRA 378 118. Ignacio vs. CFI Bulacan, 42 SCRA 89 119.Dela Cruz vs. CA, 510 SCRA 103 120.Onquit vs. Binamira-Parcia, 297 SCRA 354 121. Vda de Victoria vs. CA, 449 SCRA 319 122. Hilado vs. Chavez, 438 SCRA 623 5. Doctrine of primary jurisdiction 123. Brett vs. IAC, 191 SCRA 687 124. Roxas vs. CA, G.R. No. 127876, Dec. 17, 1999 125. First Lepanto Ceramics vs. CA, 253 SCRA 552 126. Machete vs. CA, 250 SCRA 176 127. Paloma vs. Mora, 470 SCRA 711 6. Doctrine of adherence of jurisdiction/ Doctrine of continuity of jurisdiction 128. Dela Rosa vs. Roldan, 501 SCRA 34 129. Bokingo vs. CA, 489 SCRA 521 130. Bantua vs. Mercader, 350 SCRA 86 131. Aruego Jr vs. CA, 254 SCRA 711 132. Rep vs. Atlas Farms, 345 SCRA 296 7. Objections to jurisdiction over the subject matter 133. Laresma vs. Abellana, 442 SCRA 156 134. Estoesta vs. CA, 179 SCRA 203 135. De Leon vs. CA, 245 SCRA 166 136. La Naval Drug vs. CA, 236 SCRA 78 137. Fabian vs. Desierto, 295 SCRA 470 138. Calimlim vs. Ramirez, 118 SCRA 399 139.Francel Realty Corp., vs. Sycip, 469 SCRA 424 140.Vda de Barrera vs. Heirs of Legaspi, G.R. No. 174346, September 12, 2008 8. Effect of estoppels on objections to jurisdiction 141.Tijam vs. Sibonghanoy, 23 SCRA 29 142. Tolentino vs. Escalona, 26 SCRA 613 143. Carrillo vs. Allied Workers, 24 SCRA 566 144. La Naval Drug Corporation vs. CA, 236 SCRA 78, supra 145. PNOC Shipping and Transport Corp., vs. CA 297 SCRA 402 146. Alday vs. FGU Insurance Corp., 350 SCRA 113 147. Calimlim vs. Ramirez, 118 SCRA 399 148. Pangilinan vs. CA, 321 SCRA 51 C. Jurisdiction over the issues 149. Reyes vs. Diaz, 73 Phil. 484 Distinction between a question of law and a question of fact 150. Sps. Santos vs. CA, 337SCRA 67 151. Velayo-Fong vs. Sps. Velayo, 510 SCRA 320 152. Avon Cosmetics vs. LUNA, 511 SCRA 376 Exception: Sec. 5, Rule 10 153. Estolas vs. Acena, 448 SCRA 333 154. Cindy and Lynsy Garment vs. NLRC, 284 SCRA 38 D. Jurisdiction over the res or property in litigation 155. Perkins vs. Dizon, 69 Phil. 186 Sec. 15, Rule 14, 1997 Rules of Court E. Jurisdiction of courts 156. Valdez vs. China Banking Corp., 455 SCRA 687 157. Carandang vs. Hon. Aniano Desierto, G.R. No. 148076, G.R. No. 153161, January 12, 2011 158. Durisol Philippines, Inc., vs. CA, 377 SCRA 353 159.De Jesus vs. Garcia, 19 SCRA 554 160. Laresma vs. Abellana, 442 SCRA 156 161. Cruz vs. Tan, 87 Phil. 627 162. Vda. De Murga vs. Chan, 25 SCRA 441 163. Ortigas vs. Herrera, 120 SCRA 89 164. Raymundo vs. CA, 213 SCRA 457 165. Singson vs. Isabela Sawmill, 88 SCRA 623 166.Russel vs. Vestil, 304 SCRA 739 167. Barangay Sawmill vs. Heirs of Pastor, 334 SCRA 127 168.Polomok Water District vs. Polomok General Consumers Association, G.R. No.162124, October 19, 2007 169. Cruz vs. Tan, 87 Phil. 627 170. Bokingo vs. CA, 489 SCRA 521 171.Makati Development Corp., vs. Tanjuatco, 27 SCRA 401 172.Davao Light and Power Co., Inc., vs. CA, G.R. No. 147058, March 10, 2005 173. Hilaro vs. Salvador, 457 SCRA 815 174. Quinagoran vs.CA, G.R. No. 155179, August 24, 2007 175. Atuel vs. Valdez, 403 SCRA 517 176. Vda. De Barrera vs. Heirs of Legaspi, G.R. No. 174346, September 12, 2008 177. Brgy. Piapi vs. Talip, 469 SCRA 409 178. Heirs of Concha vs. Sps. Lumocso, 540 SCRA 1 179. Rosaria Pang-et, et., al., vs. Catherine Dao-as, G.R. No. 167261, March 2, 2007 180. Galuba vs. Sps. Alfredo Laureta, G.R. No. 71091, January 29, 1988 Summary Procedure 181. Go vs. CA, 297 SCRA 574 182. Five Star Marketing Corp., vs. Booc, 535 SCRA 28 183. Garcia vs. Zosa, Jr., 469 SCRA 334 184. Habagat Grill vs. DMC-Urban Property Developer,454 SCRA 653 G. Totality rule 185. Enerio vs. Alampay, 64 SCRA 142 186. Agustin vs. Bacalan, 135 SCRA 340 187. Flores vs. Mallare-Philipps, 144 SCRA 377 188.Pantranco North Express, Inc., vs. Standard Insurance Co, Inc., 453 SCRA 482 H. Residual jurisdiction
