Preview only show first 10 pages with watermark. For full document please download

Transcript

Technische Universität Dresden Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Science Destruction of Cultural Heritage during the Post-Yugoslav Wars: 1991-1999 and 2004 Croatia, Bosnia-Hercegovina, Kosovo A Critical Discourse Analysis Dissertation for the attainment of the academic degree Doctor philosophiae (Dr. phil. (Ph.D.)) presented by: Tobias Strahl (M. A.) reviewed by: Prof. Dr. Bruno Klein Prof. Dipl.-Ing. M. Arch. (Cornell) Thomas Will Technische Universität Dresden Philosophische Fakultät Kulturerbezerstörung in den Postjugoslawischen Kriegen: 1991-1999 und 2004 Kroatien, Bosnien-Herzegovina, Kosovo Eine kritische Diskursanalyse Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor philosophiae (Dr. phil.) vorgelegt von: Tobias Strahl (M. A.) geboren am 28. Mai 1978 in Dresden Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Bruno Klein Prof. Dipl.-Ing. M. Arch. (Cornell) Thomas Will Abstract Throughout the Post-Yugoslav Wars in Croatia, Bosnia-Hercegovina and Kosovo in the years of 19911999 as well as during the so-called “March riots” of 17 and 18 March 2004 in Kosovo a large number of immovable cultural and religious objects were destroyed or heavily damaged. Moreover, thousands of movable objects belonging to the cultural heritage of the region were (mostly illegally) removed from collections, places of their origin or conventionally agreed locations of display. A careful comparison of all relevant sources, both regional and international, shows that altogether 6103 individual built objects (Croatia 1602, Bosnia-Hercegovina 4024, Kosovo 477) belonging to the religious and cultural heritage of the region were destroyed or more or less heavily damaged in the course of war. A precise account of destroyed, stolen or otherwise illegally removed movable cultural and religious objects on the other hand can barely be given since the relevant archives and classification systems of the republics of the former Socialist Yugoslav Federation were for different reasons partially corrupted and characterized by a high degree of inconsistency. Exhaustive investigations of the religious and cultural heritage destroyed during the Post-Yugoslav Wars in the years of 1991-1999 and 2004 by relevant international and supranational institutions as UNESCO, ICOMOS, ICOM or responsible European institutions were never conducted. All attempts from this side to evaluate the destruction and damage in respect of quantity and quality were deficient, incomplete and characterized by a remarkable lack of knowledge as well of the region itself as of its historical and cultural specifics. More than two decades after the wars in Croatia, Bosnia-Hercegovina and Kosovo only a fractional part of the destroyed and damaged cultural and religious heritage has been investigated and confirmed independently by international institutions not belonging to any of the warring parties. The dissertation thesis, submitted by the candidate in June 2016 at the Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Science at the Technische Universität Dresden (TUD), is the result of more than ten years of research on the history and fate of the cultural heritage on the Balkan Peninsula, focusing on the territory of the former Yugoslavia. It locates the destruction of cultural heritage during the Post-Yugoslav Wars in the years of 1991-1999 as well as the anti-Serbian riots in Kosovo in March 2004 in a broader historical investigation on the history and fate of cultural heritage since the emergence of the Balkan nation states at the end of the eighteenth and the beginning of the nineteenth century, especially focusing on the different political caesura as the national uprisings against Ottoman rule in Serbia, Greece and Bulgaria, furthermore the occupation of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia by Nazi-Germany from 1941 to 1945 as well as the “Second Yugoslavia” under communist rule. Thematically it focuses on the fate of the heterogeneous cultural and religious heritage of the various religious and ethnic groups as the Catholic, Orthodox, Muslim and Jewish sacred architecture, including the fate of the communist monuments erected between 1945 and 1991. Therefore, it investigates the heritage policies of the different political systems in the territory of the former Yugoslavia since the beginning of the nineteenth century in close relation to the transforming political and social discourses. Methodically the dissertation thesis is based on the Discourse analysis as developed by the French historian and philosopher Michel Foucault, further developed by scholars as Achim Landwehr (historical discourse analysis) and Sigfried Jäger (critical discourse analysis). Thus, the thesis investigates statements and utterances made in the different regional and international discourses on the destruction of cultural heritage as given in both regional and international media, institutional and scientific publications as well as in the political propaganda of the warring parties in the years from 1991 to 2014. It contains a great quantity of original documents (in copy) regarding the cultural heritage of the region e.g. by now unpublished statistics on built heritage, the documentation of the transport of whole archives from Kosovo to Serbia during the course of the war, imagery of the destroyed and damaged objects and reactions of various individual authors. The dissertation thesis will be available as hard copy in German language at the Sächsische Landesbibliothek – Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Dresden (SLUB) in November 2016. A further publication as well as a translation into English language is in preparation. Content Preface I i Destroyed churches and ravaged countries – on the contemporary imagination of Ottoman Rule at the Balkan Peninsula and in Croatia in national mythology and attempts of universal historiography I.1 3 Rejected heritage – on the contemporary imagination of the Ottoman Rule in the national mythologies of the nation states on the Balkan Peninsula and in Croatia. 5 I.1.2 Under the „Turkish Yoke“ 7 I.1.2.3 Serbia 8 I.1.2.4 Montenegro 9 I.1.2.5 Bulgaria 11 I.1.2.6 Greece 12 I.1.2.7 Macedonia 13 I.1.3 Antemurale Christianitatis – rampart of the der Christendom 16 I.1.3.1 Croatia 16 I.1.3.2 Romania 17 I.1.4 Contradictions, Similarities 18 I.1.5 The intimate “Others“ – The Muslims of the Balkan Peninsula 19 I.1.5.1 Albania, Kosovo 19 I.1.5.2 Bosnia-Hercegovina 20 I. 1.6 Conclusion – on the structure of national myths on the Balkan Peninsula and in Croatia I.2 22 Conquest and administration – Ottoman rule from the conquest of the Balkan Peninsula until the emergence of the national discourses in the eighteenth century 25 I.2.1 The Ottoman conquest of the Balkan Peninsula 25 I.2.2 The administration of the conquered territories 27 I.2.3 On the destruction of sacred architecture in the Ottoman Empire 31 I.2.3.1 A case study: The Monastery of the Holy Archangels and the Sinan Pasha Mosque in I.2.3.1.1 Prizren, Kosovo 31 Where to start from 32 I.2.3.1.2 The Monastery of the Holy Archangels – its history before the Ottoman conquest of Prizren in 1455 32 I.2.3.1.3 The “destruction” of the Monastery in the scientific and in the popular discourse 34 I.2.3.1.4 Facts, Myths, Contradictions 42 I.2.3.1.5 Who was Sinan-Pasha? 49 I.2.3.1.6 Sinan-Pasha and the Monastery of the Holy Archangels – Deconstruction of a myth? 51 I.2.3.1.7 Conclusion – heritage replaces history 55 I.2.3.2 Christian sacred architecture during Ottoman rule on the Balkan Peninsula and in Croatia I.3 57 On the contradiction between contemporary popular imagination of the Ottoman Rule and historical objectivity 62 II Theoretical principles – Discourse and reproduction 67 II.1 Preface 69 II.2 Discourse 70 II.2.1 Historical narration and discourse analysis 70 II.2.2 Multi-perspective description 72 II.3 Discourse analysis 73 II.3.1 Madness and Civilization (1961) 73 II.3.2 The Birth of the Clinic (1963) 75 II.3.3 The Order of Things (1966) 76 II.3.4 Conclusion I 77 II.3.5 The Archaeology of Knowledge (1969) 79 II.3.6 Conclusion II 81 II.3.7 The “Characteristics” of the discourse 83 II.3.8 Discourse in the meaning of this work 84 II.3.9 Power 87 II.4 Reproduction II.4.1 Attribution of meaning – “Aura” and (technical) reproduction in the work of 93 Walter Benjamin 93 II.5 One first example – War, art and the independence of Greece 98 III Erasing the traces – cultural and religious architecture in the nationalist discourses on the Balkan Peninsula during the nineteenth and twentieth century 107 III.1 Nationalist discourse 109 III.1.1 Basics 109 III.1.2 Nationalism as a historical phenomenon 113 III.1.2.1 Nationalism as a power strategy 114 III.1.2.2 Economy and bourgeoisie 115 III.1.2.3 Nationalism in a phase-model 117 III.1.2.4 The constructed nation 120 III.1.2.5 Conclusion 129 III.2 Cultural and religious objects in the nationalist discourses on the Balkan Peninsula 130 III.2.1 General preconditions of the nationalist discourses on the Balkan Peninsula 130 III.2.2 On the decline of the Ottoman Empire 130 III.2.3 Serbian nationalist discourse 133 III.2.3.1 The uprisings at 1804 and 1815 133 III.2.3.2 On the periodization of Serbian national historiography 134 III.2.3.3 Nationalist discourse and political power in Serbia 137 III.2.3.4 Nationalist discourse, typology and variability of criteria 144 III.2.3.5 Excursus: culture 149 III.2.3.6 Cultural and nationalist discourse in Serbia 152 III.2.3.7 The Kosovo-Myth 154 III.2.3.8 Deconstruction – destruction of cultural and religious objects 163 III.2.3.9 On more time Prizren: The portico of the Sinan Pasha Mosque 171 III.2.3.10 Construction – the erection of cultural and religious objects 180 III.2.3.11 Conclusion 182 III.2.4 The Bulgarian nationalist discourse 185 III.2.5 The nationalist discourse of the Bosnian Muslims 189 III.2.6 The Albanian nationalist discourse 191 III.2.7 The Croatian nationalist discourse 195 III.2.8 The Holocaust and the persecution of minorities in Yugoslavia 1941-1945 201 III.2.8.1 On the persecution and killing of the Yugoslav Jews and the destruction of their cultural and religious heritage 201 III.2.8.2 Serbs 210 III.2.8.3 Bosnian Muslims 213 III.2.8.4 Romani 214 III.2.9 Conclusion 215 III.2.9.1 Presentability 215 III.2.9.2 On the meaning of cultural and religious objects in the nationalist discourse 217 III.2.9.3 Cultural heritage 218 IV Cultural and religious heritage in the socialist Yugoslavia 225 IV.1 Preconditions 227 IV.1.1 On the relation of the communists of Yugoslavia to its religious communities 228 IV.1.1.1 Catholicism and the Catholic Church of Croatia 228 IV.1.1.2 The Serbian Orthodox Church 231 IV.1.1.3 The Muslims of Yugoslavia 234 IV.1.1.4 The Jewish communities of Yugoslavia 235 IV.1.1.5 Conclusion I 236 IV.1.2 Monument protection and modernization 238 IV.1.2.1 Excursus and recourse: pictorial evidence – on the documentation of the cultural heritage of the Balkan Peninsula in early photographs 240 IV.1.2.2 Priština / Prishtina 244 IV.1.2.3 Monument protection 251 IV.1.2.4 Prizren 255 IV.1.2.5 On the fate of Jewish houses of prayer and gathering in the socialist Yugoslavia 262 IV.1.2.6 On the presentation of the Yugoslav regime in architecture and sculpture V The discourse on the destruction of cultural heritage in the Post-Yugoslav Wars 263 1991-1999 und 2004 267 Preface 269 V.1 Preconditions: The socialist Yugoslavia – constellation of conflicts 273 V.1.2 The national question, the legacy of the wars and the terror of communist retributive justice 273 V.1.3 Economic crisis 280 V.2 Nationalist discourses in the post-war period 284 V.2.1 Croatian nationalist discourse after 1945 284 V.2.1.1 The Catholic Church of Croatia 285 V.2.1.2 Building activities of the Catholic Church of Croatia after 1945 287 V.2.1.3 Political and economic diaspora 287 V.2.1.4 The „Croatian Spring“ 288 V.2.1.5 Croatian nationalism as a mass phenomenon 291 V.2.2 Nationalistic discourse of the Bosnian Muslims after 1945 294 V.2.2.1 National self-awareness of the Bosnian Muslims and the building of Islamic religious structures 295 V.2.3 Nationalistic discourse of the Albanian population of Kosovo after 1945 297 V.2.4 Nationalistic discourse of Serbia after 1945 302 V.2.4.1 Protagonists and objects 302 V.2.4.2 Serbs in Croatia 305 V.2.4.3 Kosovo in the Serbian nationalist discourse 306 V.2.4.4 The Protests in Kosovo in 1981 and the Appeal for the protection of the Serbian population and their sacred sites of 1982 306 V.2.4.5 On the building activities of the Serbian Orthodox Church 315 V.2.4.6 The Serbian Academy of Science and Arts and the Memorandum of 1986 317 V.2.4.7 Slobodan Milošević and the Post-Yugoslav Wars 321 V.3 The destruction of cultural and religious objects during the wars in Croatia, BosniaHercegovina and Kosovo 1991-2004 332 V.3.1 The “quality” of the war – on the structure of the fighting units 332 V.3.2 War objectives 346 V.3.3 Destruction – scenarios 352 V.3.4 Terror and expansion 356 V.3.4.1 Croatia 1991 356 V.3.4.2 Vukovar 372 V.3.4.3 Dubrovnik 381 V.3.4.4 Libraries 385 V.3.4.5 Destruction of cultural heritage in Croatia 1991 – extent and territorial dimensions 386 V.3.5 Destruction of Cultural heritage – Identities 391 V.3.5.1 Četniks 391 V.3.5.2 Nazis and Fascists 393 V.3.5.3 Dragons 395 V.3.5.4 Blasting Tito 398 V.3.6 Destruction of cultural heritage – propaganda und international perception 404 V.3.7 The documentation of the destruction of cultural heritage in Croatia 419 V.3.7.1 December 1991 und June 1992: The documentation of the Institute for Monument Protection of the Republic of Croatia V.3.7.2 419 February1992: The documentation of the Ministry for Information, the Ministry for Culture and the Institute for Monument Protection of the Republic of Serbia 422 V.3.7.3 1993: The Association of Croatian Libraries: The Wounded Libraries in Croatia. 427 V.3.7.4 1993: The documentation of the Institute for History of Art in Zagreb, the Ministry of Culture and Education and the Institute for Monument Protection of the Republic of Croatia V.3.7.5 February 1993: The first report of the Committee for Culture and Education of the Council of Europe V.3.7.6 437 February 1993: Dubrovnik II – the documentation of war damage under the auspices of the UNESCO V.3.7.7 431 446 July 1993: The second report of the Committee for Culture and Education of the Council of Europe 447 V.3.7.8 September 1993: The third report of the Committee for Culture and Education of the Council of Europe V.3.7.9 1994: “Spiritual Genocide” – on Serbian Orthodox sacred buildings in Croatia by Slobodan Mileusnić V.3.7.10 471 1994: Branka Šulc for the Muzejski Dokumentacijski Centar – Destruction of cultural heritage in Croatia V.3.7.14 465 August 1994: The sixth report of the Committee for Culture and Education of the Council of Europe V.3.7.13 460 April 1994: The fifth report of the Committee for Culture and Education of the Council of Europe V.3.7.12 451 January 1994: The fourth report of the Committee for Culture and Education of the Council of Europe V.3.7.11 451 474 December 1994: Dubrovnik III – The report of the Commission of Experts of the United Nations Security Council / Annex XI: Destruction of Cultural Property Report and XI A. The Battle of Dubrovnik and the Law of Armed Conflict V.3.7.15 480 Mai 1995: Vukovar II – The seventh report of the Committee for Culture and Education of the Council of Europe 485 V.3.7.16 Recapture and Revenge 492 V.3.7.17 June 1995: The tide is turning – the eighth report of the Committee for Culture and Education of the Council of Europe V.3.7.18 492 January 1996: “Operation Storm” – the ninth report of the Committee for Culture and Education of the Council of Europe 496 V.3.7.19 After the war –last inventories (for the time being) of the destruction in Croatia 504 V.3.7.20 Spring 1996: “Librozid” – The Slovenian art historian Nataša Golob on Libraries in the areas of war V.3.7.21 1996: A “bleeding wound in the living cultural body of the Croatian territory” – Croatian Information Centre et al.: The wounded church in Croatia V.3.7.22 504 506 1997: Spiritual Genocide II – Slobodan Mileusnić’s updated information on destroyed and damaged sacred building of the Serbian Orthodox Church in Croatia and BosniaHercegovina V.3.7.23 522 January 1997: The tenth and last report of the Committee for Culture and Education of the Council of Europe on destroyed and damaged cultural heritage in Croatia and Bosnia-Hercegovina 526 V.3.7.24 1997: Shock, propaganda, disappointment – the publication “War damage to Museums and Galleries in Croatia” of the Muzejski Dokumentacijski Centar 529 V.3.7.25 The discourse on the destruction of cultural heritage in Croatia – others 533 V.3.7.26 Conclusion: Characteristics, statements and problems of the discourse on the destruction and damage of cultural heritage between 1991 and 1997 538 V.3.7.26.1 On the characteristics of the discourse 539 V.3.7.26.2 The international discourse 539 V.3.7.26.3 The problem to determine and verify the extent of damage 540 V.3.7.26.4 The problem of a lack of knowledge regarding the region within the international institutions 541 V.3.7.26.5 The problem of inconsistent reports und propaganda 543 V.3.7.26.6 The problem of the fragmentary documentation of the Croatian cultural heritage 545 V.3.7.26.7 The problem of the lack of communication and deficient international co-operation 545 V.3.7.26.8 The problem of insufficient ressources 546 V.3.7.26.9 The problem of the definition of relevant objects 547 V.3.7.26.10 The problem of the inaccessibility of certain regions 548 V.3.7.26.11 Other characteristics of the international discourse on the destruction of cultural heritage in Croatia 549 V.3.7.26.12 The regional discourse 551 V.3.8 Systematic obliteration 556 V.3.8.1 Bosnia-Hercegovina 1992-1995 556 V.3.8.2 „Ethnic Cleansing“ 562 V.3.8.3 The destruction of cultural heritage in Bosnia-Hercegovina in the regional and international perception 566 V.3.8.4 The documentation of the destruction of cultural heritage in Bosnia-Hercegovina 587 V.3.8.4.1 The reports of the Committee for Culture and Education of the Council of Europe 1993-1997 587 V.3.8.4.2 Cultural heritage in Bosnia-Hercegovina as distinct from Croatia 588 V.3.8.4.3 The particular situation of Bosnian institutions for the protection of cultural heritage 590 V.3.8.4.4 On the structure of Bosnia’s monument protection during the war 593 V.3.8.4.5 Missions, sources, scenarios of the destruction and extent of the damage, international reactions 595 V.3.8.4.6 Sources 597 V.3.8.4.7 Scenarios of the destruction and extent of damage 600 V.3.8.4.8 International reactions 607 V.3.8.4.9 Mostar 610 V.3.8.4.10 Sarajevo 624 V.3.8.4.11 Banja Luka 635 V.3.8.4.12 The report of the Federal Institute for the protection of the historico-cultural and natural heritage of the Republic of Bosnia-Hercegovina of 1995 644 V.3.8.4.13 András Riedlmayer in Bosnia-Hercegovina 650 V.3.8.4.14 1997: Croatian Information Centre et al.: The crucified church in Bosnia-Hercegovina 662 V.3.8.4.15 1997: Slobodan Mileusnić’s “Spiritual Genocide II“ 672 V.3.8.4.16 1999: Council of Europe – Specific Action Plan for Bosnia and Herzegovina 673 V.3.8.4.17 1999: Muharem Omerdić – Prilozi Izučavanju Genocida nad Bošnjacima (1992-1995) V.3.8.4.18 The discourse on the destruction of cultural heritage in Bosnia-Hercegovina – others V.3.8.4.19 674 682 Conclusion: The discourse on the destruction and damage of the cultural heritage in Bosnia-Hercegovina 1992-1995 684 V.3.9 Recapture and Revenge II – Kosovo 1998/99 687 V.3.9.1 (Re-) Serbianization of Kosovo and Albanian resistance 692 V.3.9.1.2 Temporary measures – Privremene Mere 692 V.3.9.1.3 Evidence of the Serbianization of the cultural heritage of Kosovo – the Register of the immovable cultural heritage of the Institute of Statistics of the Republic of Serbia 1994/1995 701 V.3.9.1.4 On the role of the Serbian Orthodox Church in the Re-Serbianization of Kosovo 707 V.3.9.2 The documentation of the destruction of cultural heritage in Kosovo 710 V.3.9.2.1 Initial conditions 710 V.3.9.2.2 The removal of the documentation of the immovable cultural heritage in Kosovo by Serbian authorities and its transport to Serbia 712 V.3.9.2.3 International und regional reactions I – Serbian religious and cultural heritage 716 V.3.9.2.4 Governmentally organized disinformation: Republic of Serbia, Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs: NATO Crimes in Yugoslavia / Documentary Evidence / 24 March – 24 April 1999 und NATO Crimes in Yugoslavia / Documentary Evidence / 25 April – 10 June 1999 V.3.9.2.5 1999: Crucified Kosovo: the Serbian Orthodox Church and its publication Crucified Kosovo / Raspeto Kosovo V.3.9.2.6 725 733 Secular Serbian institutions and authors on the destruction and damage of Serbian cultural heritage in Kosovo 740 V.3.9.2.7 The Institute for Monument Protection of the Republic of Serbia: Cultural Heritage of Kosovo and Metohija (1999 (2002)) V.3.9.2.8 2002: Branislav Krstić: Saving the Cultural Heritage of Serbia and Europe in Kosovo and Metohia V.3.9.2.9 740 746 Mnemosyne – Centre for Protection of Natural and Cultural Heritage of Kosovo and Metohija: Final Report / Project /Protection of Natural and Cultural Heritage in Metohija (2003) V.3.9.2.10 760 Conclusion – topoi of the Serbian discourse on the destruction and damage of the Serbian cultural heritage in Kosovo 768 V.3.10 The anti-Serbian riots at17 and 18 March 2004 772 V.3.10.1 Reactions in Serbia 784 V.3.10.2 Reactions of Serbian institutions 795 V.3.10.2.1 The Memorandum on Kosovo and Metohija of the Holy Synod of the Bishops of the Serbian Orthodox Church V.3.10.2.2 796 The Ministry for Culture of the Republic of Serbia and the Museum of Priština: March Pogrom in Kosovo and Metohija / March 17-19, 2004 798 V.3.10.2.3 Ana Jović-Lazić: Zaštita kulturne baštine na Kosovu i Metohiji 800 V.3.10.2.4 Crucified Kosovo II – radicalization of the diction 803 V.3.10.2.5 One more time Mnemosyne – the Report on the study of endangered Serbian Sacred/Holy Places in Kosovo and Metohija V.3.11 804 On the international reception of institutional and individual statements in the Serbian discourse on the destruction and damage of cultural heritage in Kosovo 807 V.3.11.1 Simon Jenkins: Not war but vandalism 807 V.3.11.2 Nikolaus Thon: The End of a thousand-year-old culture? 809 V.3.11.3 Slobodan Ćurčić: Destruction of Serbian cultural patrimony in Kosovo: a world-wide precedent? V.3.11.4 812 Valentino Pace: Kosovo: passato, presente e futuro dei suoi monumenti cristiani in pericolo 814 V.3.11.5 Positions from the Serbian discourse in the international discourse – others 816 V.3.12 International and regional reactions II: Albanian and Ottoman religious and cultural heritage V.3.12.1 818 Albanian initiatives for the assessment and documentation of the destroyed and damaged cultural heritage of Kosovo 818 V.3.12.1.1 „Serbian genocide at the Albanian culture– an exhibition in Ðakovica/Gjakova 818 V.3.12.1.2 The documentation of Islamic sacred buildings by the Islamic Society of Kosovo 820 V.3.12.2 International reactions 825 V.3.12.2.1 András Riedlmayer in Kosovo 825 V.3.12.2.2 International reactions – others 835 V.3.13 International Institutions and the cultural heritage of Kosovo 840 V.3.13.1 Preconditions 840 V.3.13.2 Cancellation of the Yugoslav (Serbian) legislation for monument protection and the Action Plan for Cultural Heritage in Kosovo V.3.13.3 International Management Group: Emergency Assessment of damaged housing and local/village Infrastructure in Kosovo (1999) V.3.13.4 842 842 Council of Europe: Cultural Situation in Kosovo (Montenegro and Serbia) (1999-2002) 843 V.3.13.5 UNESCO: General Assessment of the Situation of Archives in Kosovo (2000) 845 V.3.13.6 John A. Bold und Rob Pickard: Study on the State of the Cultural Heritage in Kosovo (2001) 846 V.3.13.7 UNESCO: Cultural Heritage in South-East Europe: Kosovo (2003) 848 V.3.13.8 Council of Europe: Edward O’Hara on the cultural situation in Kosovo (2003) 854 V.3.13.9 The anti-Serbian riots in March 2004 – UNMIK, UNESCO, European Commission and Council of Europe V.3.13.10 857 European Commission / Council of Europe / UNMIK: Integrated Rehabilitation Project Plan (2004 (20006)) 858 V.3.13.11 UNESCO: Cultural Heritage in South-East Europe: Kosovo (2004) 860 V.3.13.12 The Memorandum of Understanding on Agreed General Principles for the Reconstruction of Serbian Orthodox Religious Sites and the Reconstruction Implementation Commission (2004 (2005)) 861 V.3.13.13 Cultural Heritage Law (2006) und Law on Special Protective Zones (2008) 865 V.3.13.14 Conclusion 868 V.3.14 Excursus – Reconstruction, Renovation and Overwriting 870 V.3.14.1 Croatia 872 V.3.14.2 Bosnia-Hercegovina 878 V.3.14.3 Kosovo 887 V.3.14.4 Serbia 904 V.3.14.5 Macedonia 906 V.3.15 The “others” – Opposite positions in the discourse on the destruction of cultural heritage during the Post-Yugoslav Wars 908 V.3.15.1 Serbia 908 V.3.15.2 Kosovo 915 V.3.15.3 Croatia 917 V.3.16 Evergreens and false (?) friends 919 V.3.16.1 The bridge as a symbol of reconciliation 920 V.3.16.2 Peasant eats citizen – the rural murders the urban space 924 V.3.16.3 Destruction of architecture interpreted with Derrida – representation of ethnicity and modernity 928 List of figures 931 Bibliography 945 Materials 1001 Chart 0001: Comparative summary of the cultural and religious heritage destroyed and damaged throughout the Post-Yugoslav Wars as mentioned in regional and international publications listed alphabetical order in 1003 Chart 0002: Register of the immovable cultural heritage of the Republic of Serbia (including Kosovo), effective by the year of 1994. Nepokretna Registrovana Kulturna Dobra / Stanje 31. 12. 1994. godine. Bilten 372, Sig. 31:7, Nr. 16224 Republika Srbija / Republički Zavod za Statistiku, Belgrad 1995. Transcript 1045